Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 48910 (BOM)
SACHIN VINOD KATYAL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS COLLECTOR, CHANDRAPUR AND ANOTHER
WP/2407/2020 · 2025-07-09
Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48910 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48910 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
15. WP 2407 of 2020.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2407/2020 Sachin Vinod Katyal ...Versus… The State of Maharashtra through its Collector, Chandrapur, District : Chandrapur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -
Mr. A.A. Dhawas, Advocate for petitioner Mrs. S.S. Jachak, Addl. G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. R.D. Hajare, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 09/07/2025
1. Learned Additional Government Pleader has raised objection about the maintainability of the petition since the petitioner has alternate remedy, provided under the law.
2.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes the said position.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal before the Appellate Authority.
4. Needless to say that all points are kept open to be decided by the Appellate Authority.
5. No order as to costs.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
Wadkar 2025:BHC-NAG:6507