- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41136 RFA No. 938 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 938 OF 2019 (MON) BETWEEN: SRI BABU REDDY S/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABIDYT 44 YEARS R/AT HALANAYAKANAHALLI SARJAPUR ROAD BENGALURU – 560 035 …APPELLANT (BY SRI.BABU REDDY, NO REPRESENTATION) AND: SRI LOKESH REDDY S/O APPAYAREDDY AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT NO.18/4 KORAMANGALA VILLAGE Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41136 RFA No. 938 of 2019 OPP KORAMANGALA POLICE STATION KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560035 …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.02.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.5808/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41136 RFA No. 938 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Since, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to retire from the case by the order dated 13.08.2024, Court notice was ordered to be issued on 13.08.2024. The Court notice issued to the appellant is returned with postal shara as "Address is Insufficient and not available for service”. 2. Upon perusing the cause title in the appeal memorandum, it is impossible to get service of notice to the appellant, as Bangalore is a big City to find given address as per cause title. Here, the Court is handicapped to get service of notice to the appellant to the address given by the appellant/plaintiff as could be seen from the cause title in memorandum of appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10