1 2025:CGHC:52397 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5584 of 2025 1 - Keshavram Dhruv Son Of Bhaiyaram Dhruv Aged About 58 Years (But Wrongly Mentioned In Document Keshoram Dhruv) Resident Of Village- Bakli, Tahsil- Rajim District- ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - The Tahsildar Rajim District- Gariyaband (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Pandey, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Ajit Singh, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 28/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is in possession over the land bearing Khasra No.361, ad-measuring 0.50 hectare situated at Village Bakli, P.H. No. 23, Tehsil Rajim, District Gariyaband (C.G.) since long. He would submit that an application was moved before the Collector, Dist.-Gariyaband according to the provisions contained in The Chhattisgarh Krishi Prayojan Ke Liye Upyog Ki Ja Rahi Dakhalrahit Bhumi Par Bhumiswami Adhikaron Ka Pradan Kiya Jana (Vishesh Upbandh) Niyam, 1986 [for short The Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.10.29 11:58:43 +0530 2 Rules, 1986] but till date, same has not been decided. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would submit that petitioner ought to have moved an application before Tehsildar/ Naib Tehsildar according to the provisions of the Rules, 1986 whereas the petitioner has moved application before Collector, District Gariyaband. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Taking into consideration the limited grievance of the petitioner, petitioner is permitted to make a representation before the concerned Tehsildar/ Naib-Tehsildar according to the provisions of The Rules, 1986 within a period of 30 days. It is expected that if such application is moved by the petitioner, the concerned authority shall decide the same preferably within a further period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s) & direction(s), the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti