Panthangi Venkata Koteswara Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/11361/2019 · 2025-12-09
Ninala Jayasurya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48905 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48905 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010251612019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 11361/2019 Between:
1. PANTHANGI VENKATA KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O VENKATA GURUNADHA RAO, AGE 56 YEARS, R/O 13TH BLOCK, MACHERLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP.
2. BATCHU SRINIVAS RAO,, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGE 35 YEARS, R/O 13TH BLOCK, MACHERLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, . ARNARAVATHI, AP.
2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DIST. GUNTUR. AP
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICERRDO, GURAZALA, GUNTUR DIST, AP.
4. THE TAHASILDAR, DURGI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP.
5. DODDI SRINIVASA LAXMIKUMARI, W/O LATE RATTAIAH, R/O.
SATYASAI VIDYA VIHAR, Z.P. COMOOUND, GUNTUR.
6. ADAPA VENKATA PRABHAKARA RAO DIED, S.O RATTIAH, R/O CHANDRAJUPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP
7. ADAPA GUNDA RUKMINI DEVI, W/O LATE ADAPA @ GUNDA VENKATA PRABHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,R/O
NJS,J W.P No.11361 of 2019 2
SAMPATH NAGAR, RAMACHANDRA COLONY, GUNTUR.
8. ADAPA GUNDA LAKSHMI NARAYANA KRISHNA PRASAD, W/O LATE ADAPA @ GUNDA VENKATA PRABHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,R/O SAMPATH NAGAR, RAMACHANDRA COLONY, GUNTUR.
9. ADAPA GUNDA KASI VISWANATHAM, W/O LATE ADAPA @ GUNDA VENKATA PRABHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,R/O SAMPATH NAGAR, RAMACHANDRA COLONY, GUNTUR. RR 7 TO 9 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.RS OF THE DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.6 AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT.19.10.2024 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO. 01 OF 2024.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SHAIK SULTANA
2. SULTANA SHAIK
3. G V RAMANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. NANDA KISHORE KONDURI
2. M VIDYAVATHI
3. .
NJS,J W.P No.11361 of 2019 3
The Court made the following Order:
At the time of considering the matter, Smt. Shaik Sultana, learned counsel, states that she did not secure any instructions from the petitioners or from the counsel along with whom she filed vakalath.
2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:10.12.2025 Ksj