[2025:RJ-JP:11202] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1268/2025 Vinod S/o Harjilal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Raghunathpura, P.s. Nainwa, Distrit Bundi, (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Sampat Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Naman Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.436/2024 registered at Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that initially, proceedings were initiated under Section 176 Cr.PC on the basis of written report submitted by the complainant himself wherein he did not level any allegation against the petitioner then after day 10 days, present FIR came to be registered against him for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC alleging therein that petitioner is husband of the [2025:RJ-JP:11202] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1268/2025] deceased and he has committed her murder. After thorough investigation, offence punishable under section 302 of IPC was not found proved against the petitioner and police filed charge-sheet for the offence punishable under section 306 of IPC. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that according to the post mortem report some injuries were also found on the person of the deceased. It is submitted that complainant did not give any application stating that her daughter committed suicide and his signature was obtained on blank paper. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, so also considering the material made available on record in the form of charge-sheet including proceedings initiated under Section 176 Cr.PC and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Vinod S/o Harjilal shall be released on [2025:RJ-JP:11202] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1268/2025] bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /426