Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4889 (AP)

CHILUKURI MURALIMOHAN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/2085/2025 · 2025-02-03

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

■ 1 s IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2085 OF 2025 Between; 1. Chilukuri Muralimohan, S/o. Suryachandra Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ Cultivation Tirapanna Street, Achanta-534123, Achanta Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. Chilukuri Ramalakshmi, W/o. Murali Mohan Aged about 40 years, Occ Housewife, Achanta-534123, West Godavari District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, (Horticulture, Aquaculture & Fisheries), Agricultural and Cooperation Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Commissioner of Fisheries, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Bandar Road, Poranki, Vijayawada - 521137. 3. The Additional Director of Fisheries, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Bandar Road, Poranki, Vijayawada - 521137. 4. The District Collector-cum-Chairman, District Aquaculture Authority, Bhimavaram - 534201. 5. The Superintending Engineer (Operation), APEPDCL, Eluru/Bhimavaram. 6. The District Fisheries Officer, Fisheries Department, Bhimavaram - 534201. 7. The Deputy Director, Groundwater Department,Bhimavaram 8. The Tahsildar, Achanta,Achanta Mandal. 9. The Agricultural Officer, Achanta Mandal, Achanta -534201. -534123. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue a writ or order or direction with nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent authorities in not taking steps in taking action in pursuance of representation dated 03.07.2024 and 13.08.2024 against illegal aqua culture activity in Achanta Village, Achanta Mandal of West illegal, arbitrary consequently direct the representation 03.07.2024 and 13.08.2024 and take praying that in the may be more particularly in the my Godavari District as authorities to consider my appropriate action against the illegal aqua culture activity in R.S.No.96-1A-1A, 96-2B-2, 96-3A, 96-3B, 96-3C, 96-3D-1, 96- 1A-2, 96-1B, 97/2B, 96/3E2, 96/2B, 95/4, with 96-1C, 96-ID, 96-1E, 96-2A-1, a total extent of approximately Ac.9-43 cents Achanta Village, Achanta Mandal of West Godavari District and to as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and pass such other order or orders proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities consider 03.07.2024 and 13.08.2024 pending disposal of the above writ petition. my representation dated Counsel for the PetitionersiSRI. MEDAPATI SANTOSH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1&9: GP FOR HORTICULTURE Counsel for the Respondents 2,3,4,6&7: GP FOR FISHERIES Counsel for the Respondents 8: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: Order APHC010038562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2085/2025 Between: Chilukuri Muralimohan and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.MEDAPATI SANTOSH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR FISHERIES 3.GP FOR AGRICULTURE V- it 2 f The Court made the following order:- The learned Assistant Government Pleader for the Fisheries Department submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been disposed of. Upon this submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, sought permission/leave of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. The learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the respondents are directed to communicate the decision. with regard to the representation submitted by the petitioner, within a period of one week from today. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. OneCCto SRI. MEDAPATI SANTOSH REDDY Advocate [OPUC) 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HORTICULTURE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP 4. Two CCs to GP FOR FISHERIES, High Court of Andhra Prasdesh.[OUT] 5. Three CD copies MNV r HIGH COURT DATED:03/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.2085 of 2025 of S»- yo- X n FEB 2025 « & . Current oecuon DIS^SSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN COSTS ’ WITHOUT