APHC010617452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the twenty fifth The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Revision Petition No: Between: G.V. Ramana Reddy and o Oliver Vanijya Private Limited Counsel for the petitioner B. Paramesewara Rao Counsel for the respondent: NIL The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) twenty fifth day of November two thousand and twenty five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Revision Petition No: 3281 of 2025 G.V. Ramana Reddy and others ...Petitioner and Oliver Vanijya Private Limited ...Respondent etitioners: B. Paramesewara Rao espondent: The Court made the following: [3311] two thousand and twenty five Petitioners Respondent 2 C.R.P.No.3281 of 2025 O R D E R: This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue appropriate directions for expeditious disposal of a suit in O.S.No.203 of 2021 pending on the file of the court of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Penukonda. 2. As can be seen from the docket proceedings, initially suit was adjourned from time to time for service of summons and thereafter for steps to take substitute service of summons and thrice for enquiry under Section 89 C.P.C. till 11.01.2024 and thereafter the suit was adjourned from time to time for framing of issues till 28.07.2025. Presently, the suit was posted for trial to 26.09.2025 and 19.11.2025. At this juncture, the revision petitioners / defendants Nos.1 to 6 filed this revision petition. 3. The Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of U.P. & others (Criminal Appeal No.3589 of 2023, dated 29.02.2024) gave a caution to High Courts not to direct the trial Courts for expeditious disposal of the case except in exceptional cases as there may be other older cases which need early disposal and such direction would adversely affect the functioning of the trial Courts. It is held in para 37 (c) as follows: “Constitutional Courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other Courts. Constitutional Courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the concerned Courts where the cases are pending”. 4. In view of the same, the revision petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners / defendants Nos.1 to 6 to make a request to the 3 C.R.P.No.3281 of 2025 trial Court for expeditious disposal of the suit. Keeping in view the total pendency of the cases pending before the Court concerned, appropriate steps shall be taken by the trail Court for expeditious trial. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ B. S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt.25.11.2025 PNV