Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48885 (CHH)

NISHA KAUR @ CHHOTI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/528/2025 · 2025-10-27

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:52404-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 528 of 2025 Nisha Kaur @ Chhoti W/o Chamkaur Aged About 36 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As Daughter In Annexure A-2), R/o Pailimeta, P.S. Mohgaon, District Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai C.G. (Through Her Sister Mamta Soni, D/o Sukhcharan Singh Soni, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Naya Amapara, Ward No. 13, Arya Nagar, Durg, District Durg C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department of Home (Jail), Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Jail Superintendent Central Jail Durg, District Durg C.G. 3 - The Additional Collector, District Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai C.G. 4 - The Superintendent of Police, District Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan- Gandai C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 28.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. C.R. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :- “10.1. To call for entire records from respondents pertaining to petitioner’s leave case for kind perusal of the Hon’ble High Court. 10.2. To quash impugned memo dated 27.08.2025 (Annexure P-1) and also to direct respondents to release petitioner on parole under the Chhattisgarh Prisoner’s Leave Rules, 1989. 10.3. To grant any other relief deemed fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the present petition which has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for release on parole and listed today along with CRA No. 698 of 2024 filed on behalf of the very same petitioner along with co-accused for final hearing. 4. In view of the same, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra