APHC010120742016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5619/2016 Between: 1. A P CONTRACT LABOUR UNION (REGD NO.B 1996), (AFFILIATED TO BHARATEEYA MAZDOOR SANGH) TECHNICAL WING, D.NO. 22- 3-2/2, GADIVARI STREET, POWERPET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, T.SESHACHALAM 2. M.SRINIVASA RAO, S/ O SATYANARAVANA, AGED 40 YEARS, WORKING AS CONTRACT SHIFT OPERATOR, 33/11 KV ELECTRICAL SUB STATION, RAGHAVAPURAM, CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. A.V.ATCHAIAH BABU, S/O VENKATA RAMANA, AGED 43 YEARS, WORKING AS CONTRACT SHIFT OPERATOR, 33/11 KV ELECTRICAL SUB STATION, RAJAM, 3UTCHIYYAPET MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENERGY (OP.A3) DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH, LIMITED AT VIDYUT SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY ADDITIONAL, COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RAGHUVEER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY 2. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 3. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) 4. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring the Memo dt 20.4.2015 in Memo No.1875/OP.A3/2014-3 issued by first respondent as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of A P Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 2003 and to consequently direct the Respondents "to restore G 0 Ms No. 5 dt 24.1.2011 issued by Government of Andhra Pradesh, Labour, Employment, Training and Factories (Lab.II) Department rep by its Secretary to Government ; Award costs….” 2. On 24.09.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner/s. Post the matter on 25.09.2025 under the caption „for dismissal‟.” 3. On 25.09.2025, this Court passed the following order: “Today also, no representation for the petitioners. Post on 26.09.2025 under the same caption of dismissal.” 4. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption „for dismissal‟, none appeared for the petitioners. From this, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 26.09.2025 Ivd 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.5619 of 2016 Date: 26.09.2025 Ivd