Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010387432021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23867/2021 Between:
1. A NAGAESWARA RAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 4LYEARS, D.NO.16B-17-22/2, TANGELLAMUDI, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DIRECTOR, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI
4. THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND ACCOUNT OFFICER, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, OF
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SRI KRISHNA ENCLAVE, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2
6. THE ELURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
8. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVASA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
2. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP )
3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents in not releasing the payments for the work executed by the petitioner, vide Agreement No.287/2018-19, dated 12.08.2019, executed under Measurement Book.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that amount has been credited to the account of the petitioner.
4. Recording the same, this Court is of the view that no further adjudication is required on merits.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR