M/s Victory Trading Agency v. THE STATE OF AP and 5 Ors.
WP(C)/482/2022 · 2025-06-22
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4887 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4887 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040015012022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/482/2022 M/s Victory Trading Agency Represented by its licence holder Shri Tadar Mama, R/o P Sector, Nirjuli, PO/PS Nirjuli, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. Cont. No. 918132897641
VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 5 Ors. Represented by Secretary, Home, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Under Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Home Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Director General Age: 0 Occupation : of Police Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Asstt. Inspector General Age: 0 Occupation : of Police (E) Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 5:Smart Cloud Info Fusion Pvt. Ltd. Age: 0
Page No.# 2/3 Occupation : (Pune) having its registered office at 3A Anjah off Senapati Bapat Rd. Krushi Housing Society Gokhalenagar Pune Maharashtra 411016 6:Trigyn Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Age: 0 Occupation : Having its registered office at 27 SDF 1 SEEPZ Andheri (East) Mumbai 40009 Advocate for the Petitioner : Nalo Pada, Adam Tatak,Tsering Gyatso,Bomnya Kamdak Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 23-06-2025 Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Ms K. Wangmo, learned State counsel for the State respondents is present.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant