Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48859 (BOM)

RUPESH PANDHARI KAMBLE v. ANKITA W/O RUPESH KAMBLE

WP/314/2025 · 2025-06-26

Urmila Joshi Phalke

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 955wp314.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 314 OF 2025 Rupesh Pandhari Kamble Vs Ankita w/o Rupesh Kamble Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. Sandeep Singh, counsel h/f Mr. A.M. Chandekar, counsel for petitioner. Mr. Sahil S. Dewani, counsel (appointed) for respondent. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 2 6 /06/2025. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent pointed out that the trial Court has passed an order on the interim application below Exhibit-5. In that view of the matter, the petition has become infructuous. 2. The Pursis filed by the respondent is taken on record. 3. The fees of the appointed counsel be quantified as per Rule. 4. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. [URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.] rkn