Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48856 (AP)

Prajna Educational Trust, v. Sri.R.Karikal Valaven,I.A.S.,

CC/2641/2022 · 2025-12-02

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010401262022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2641/2022 Between: 1. PRAJNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN TANGUDU VAIKUNTA RAO, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O. LATE KAMESWARA RAO, R/O.PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI R KARIKAL VALAVEN I A S, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SHRI SHRIKESH B LATHKAR I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.. 3. SMT M VIJAYA SUNEETHA, JOINT COLLECTOR (RB AND R), SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. SHRI HANUMANTU JAIRAM, SUB-COLLECTOR, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SHRI T SITARAM MURTHY, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SHRI L MADHUSUDANA, TAHSILDAR, PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. SHRI B PAPA RAO, TAHSILDAR, MANDASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 8. SHRI PRABHAKAR RAO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. DUVVADA SRIDHAR BABA, S/O. KRISHNA MURTHI, R/ O. SIVAJI NAGAR, PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of contempt of Courts Act for intentionally wilfully, deliberately, violating the orders passed by this Hon'ble High Court dated 28- 06-2022 made in I.A.No. 1 of 2022 in W.P.No.17785 of 2022, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to maintain Status quo by implementing the Hon'ble High Court order dated 28-06-2022, made in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No. 17785 of 2022 in its true letter and spirit, pending disposal of the Contempt case before this Hon'ble Court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P SUBASH 2. 3. P DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2641 of 2022 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.06.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.17785 of 2022 wherein this Court has directed the respondents to maintain status quo in respect of the revenue records pertaining to Ramakrishnapuram village of Palasa Mandal of Srikakulam District, as obtaining today. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the official respondents, by filing counter, has brought to the notice of this Court that the respondents have not changed any revenue records pertaining to Ramakrishnapuram village, Palasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the official respondents, as there is no violation in the orders passed by this Court, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. 4. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt: 03.12.2025 sj 4 98 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2641 of 2022 Dt: 03.12.2025 sj