APHC010043852021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3856/2021 Between: 1. KOTHAMASU NARASIMHA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO16-8-24, 10TH WARD, POLERAMMA VEEDHI, VADDAVALLI, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MUPPALA MANDAL, MUPPALA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in trying to allot the house sites to the third parties under Navaratnalu Scheme in front of the petitioner's 2 property to an extent of an extent of Ac.1-86 cents in Sy.No.91/B and Ac.0-86 cents in Sy.No.86 of Bollavaram village, Muppala mandal, Guntur district in which Rice Mill is situated by encroaching the Road margin without considering the legal notice dt.24-12-2020 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondent not to grant any house site pattas in favour of the third parties under Navaratnalu Scheme in front of the petitioners property to an extent of Ac 1-86 cents in Sy.No.91/B and. AC 0-86 cents in Sy.No.86 of Bollavaram village, Muppala mandal, Guntur district pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interests of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 3rd & 4th respondents in trying to allot the house sites to the 3rd parties under Navaratnalu scheme in front of the petitioner’s property to an extent of Ac.1.86 cents in Sy.No.91/B and Ac.0.86 cents in Sy.No.0.86 of Bollavaram village, Muppala Mandal, Guntur District in which rice mill is situated by encroaching the road margin without considering the legal notice dated 24.12.2020. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities will follow the due procedure. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.1.86 cents in Sy.No.91/B and Ac.0.86 cents in Sy.No.0.86 of Bollavaram village, Muppala Mandal, Guntur District strictly in accordance with law if so warranted for any public purpose and if not already used by now for the above said welfare scheme for the poor. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 25.09.2025 NNN