Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48846 (AP)

T.JAMUNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/34308/2022 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010562932022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34308/2022 Between: T.JAMUNA, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O. LATE T. GOVINDA NAIDU, OCCUPATIN FARMER, NO.4-4, PULLAIAHGARIPALLI (V), MADHAVARAM (P.O.), YADAMARI (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517128. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522502. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YADAMARI POLICE CIRCLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 517422. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517001. 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, YADAMARI DIVISION, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH 517001. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, YADAMARI MANDAL, YADAMARI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 517422. 8. MALLEDI NAGARAJULU NAIDU, S/O LATE SREEERAMULU NAIDU, PULLAIAHGARIPALLI, MADHAVARAM (P.O.), YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 517128. 9. M RATHNAM, S/O M. DORASWAMY KODIGUTTA, PERIYAMBADI(P.O.), YADAMARI (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH 517128. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in not considering petitioner's representation / complaint to restrain the 9th respondent from illegal encroachment in to her property after the lapse of 13 years purchased from 8th respondent under registered sale deed bearing No.6336/2003 executed by the 8th respondent in favor of the petitioner for valid consideration is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to receive and register complaint against the 8th and 9th respondents and direct the 5th, 6th property bearing Sy.Nos. 195/3B, 195/4, 197/1A/2, 214/3F, 214/6D Total to an extent of Ac.0.77cents situated at Periyambadi Village accounts, Periyambadi Grama Panchayat, Yadamari Mandal, Chittoor District.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on receipt of complaint from the Petitioner, Respondent No.4 called the Petitioner, enquired into the matter, recorded the statement of the Petitioner and having found that the contents of the said statement are purely civil in nature, Respondent No.4 has not registered the case and advised the Petitioner to settle the matter before competent Court. 3. Sri D.Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.34308 of 2022 Dt.19.11.2025 Dinesh