256 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DARSHAN SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Ms Mr. G.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vikas Prakash, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.45 dated 12.03.2014 under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120 District Khanna (Annexure P 2015 along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P 2. The following order was passed on 30.04.2025 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DARSHAN SINGH AND OTHERS V/S PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Ms. Simrandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vikas Prakash, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.45 dated 12.03.2014 under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Samrala District Khanna (Annexure P-1) including the challan bearing CHI No.9 of 2015 along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). The following order was passed on 30.04.2025 : “This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.45 dated 12.03.2014 under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120 Station Samrala, District Khanna (Annexure P challan bearing CHI No.9 of 2015 along with all subsequent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22909-2025 Date of decision: 27.05.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR for This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.45 dated 12.03.2014 under Sections B of IPC registered at Police Station Samrala, 1) including the challan bearing CHI No.9 of 2015 along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of The following order was passed on 30.04.2025 :- This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.45 dated 12.03.2014 under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Samrala, District Khanna (Annexure P-1) including the No.9 of 2015 along with all subsequent MANISHA 2025.05.27 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-22909 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the c parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and 22909-2025 2 proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab respondent No.1-State and Mr. Vikas Prakash, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney, which is taken on record. He admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. Adjourned to 27.05.2025. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get recorded th compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of th date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the c parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and FIR No.45 dated 12.03.2014 under Sectio proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of State and Mr. Vikas Prakash, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney, which is taken on record. He admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Adjourned to 27.05.2025. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get recorded their statements regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition FIR No.45 dated 12.03.2014 under Sections MANISHA 2025.05.27 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-22909 420/465/467/468/471/120 District Khanna of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners. May 27, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 22909-2025 3 420/465/467/468/471/120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Samrala, District Khanna (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable B of IPC registered at Police Station Samrala, and all consequential proceedings arising out HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.05.27 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment