Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48844 (RAJ)

HANSRAJ S/O BADRI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11503/2025 · 2025-09-11

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37015] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11503/2025 Hansraj S/o Badri, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Sukar Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Hansraj S/o Badri in FIR No.61/2022 dated 08.04.2022 registered at P.S. Batoda District – Sawai Madhopur, whereby the petitioner-accused has charged under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. 2. The petitioner was arrested on 26.08.2025 and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main accused Santosh has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 27.05.2022 and other co-accused named in FIR [2025:RJ-JP:37015] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11503/2025] is granted anticipatory bail by Hon’ble Supreme Court by order dated 17.07.2023. He further submits that the present petitioner is neither named in FIR nor his role and involvement is proved and currently the present petitioner is in custody since his arrest on 26.08.2025. He also submitted that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of a complaint dated 08.04.2022 for duping the complainant and his family on 20.02.2022, a report is registered and the matter is investigated. Main accused Santosh is granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 27.05.2022. Another named accused Mamta is granted anticipatory bail by Hon’ble Supreme Court on 17.07.2023 in SLP (Crl.) No.3967/2023. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioner-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused. [2025:RJ-JP:37015] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11503/2025] 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Hansraj S/o Badri is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/196