IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 113 PURAN CHAND GIRDHAR AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. for the petitioner Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court the respondents department to grant/release the pay and allowances post of Section Officer for the period during which the petitioners have performed duties as Section Officer(s) under Stop all consequential benefi Counsel for the respective parties unanimously agree that the controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated No. CWP-4388 Haryana and another” disposed of in terms of the same. Disposed of in terms of order dated APRIL 25, 202 Vishal Sharma IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11279 Date of Decision: PURAN CHAND GIRDHAR AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ******* Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana ******* VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court the respondents department to grant/release the pay and allowances post of Section Officer for the period during which the petitioners have performed duties as Section Officer(s) under Stop all consequential benefits. Counsel for the respective parties unanimously agree that the controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 17.02.2025 passed by this Court in a writ petition bearing 4388-2025 titled as “Vinit Kumar and Others versus State of Haryana and another” and they have no objection if the present petition is disposed of in terms of the same. Disposed of in terms of order dated , 2025 (VINOD S. BHARDWA Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 11279-2025 Date of Decision: 25.04.2025 PURAN CHAND GIRDHAR AND OTHERS ... Petitioners ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Sandeep Thakan, Advocate Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions to the respondents department to grant/release the pay and allowances of the post of Section Officer for the period during which the petitioners have performed duties as Section Officer(s) under Stop-Gap Arrangement with Counsel for the respective parties unanimously agree that the controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the passed by this Court in a writ petition bearing “Vinit Kumar and Others versus State of and they have no objection if the present petition is Disposed of in terms of order dated 17.02.2025 (supra). VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.04.29 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document