Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48843 (PNJ)

SURJIT SINGH MANKOO v. PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION (PSWC) AND ANOTHER

CWP/11108/2025 · 2025-04-24

To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-11108 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-11108 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.04.2025 Surjit Singh Mankoo ....Petitioner Versus Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. J. P. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA , J. (Oral) 1. In the present petition, the petitioner is praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 not to effect recovery from the pension of the petitioner till the pendency of the statutory appeal dated 23.11.2023 (Annexure P-2) filed by him against the punishment order dated 23.08.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.1 whereby, the recovery of Rs.2,09,402.22 has been imposed upon the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, prays that at this stage, he will be satisfied if a direction is given to respondent No.2 to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner expeditiously by passing a speaking order. 3. Notice of motion. DINESH 2025.04.25 02:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11108 of 2025 (O&M) 2 4. Mr. Vikas Arora, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and filed his memo of appearance, which is taken on record and submits that he has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner 5. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-the Appellate Authority to consider and decide the appeal dated 23.11.2023 (Annexure P-2), within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. 6. Since the statutory appeal is still pending and yet to be decided, it will be in the interest of justice that no further recovery be effected from the pension of the petitioner till the disposal of the appeal. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE April 24, 2025 dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.04.25 02:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document