Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48842 (RAJ)

BALBIR SINGH S/O SHRI MALARAM v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

CW/18431/2025 · 2025-11-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48340] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18431/2025 Balbir Singh S/o Shri Malaram, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Sainik Nagar, Ward No. 4, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Chairman Cum Managing Director (Raj.) 2. The Executive Director (Admin), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Cor- poration, Jhunjhunu Depot, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 27/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:- “(i) The impugned action of the respondents by which the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of selection scale/ACP from the due date may kindly be held as illegal and arbitrary and further the re- spondents be directed to grant the benefit of selection scale/ ACP on completion of 9, 18 & 27 years of ser- vice, counting the length of service from the date of initial appointment and the respondents be also di- rected to calculate the arrears accrued thereof and be released with interest”. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 20.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10581/2023 titled as ‘Dinesh Nawariya Vs. Rajasthan State [2025:RJ-JP:48340] (2 of 2) [CW-18431/2025] Road Transport Corporation and Ors.’ submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /130