APHC010193062023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10193/2023 Between: 1. KAKA ARJUN DORA, S/O. KAMESWARA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O 1-129, YATAPAKA MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 524309. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, PANCHYATH RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, 4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO-135, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE COLLECTOR OF ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 4. THE SUBCOLLECTOR OF ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE TAHSILDAR OF YETAPAKA MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE GRAM PANCHYATHY OF THRIPURAPENTAVEEDU VILLAGE, YETAPAKA MANDAL, YETAPAKA MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent authorities in not initiating any action against the encroachments over the government land of extent Ac. 0.14 cents in Survey No. 134/1 situated at Yatapaka Mandal, Alluri Seetharamaraju District, Andhra Pradesh, despite the petitioner made representation Dated 06/04/2023 which is contrary to the GO.MS. No. 188 Dated 21/07/2011 and the judgment of this Hon'ble High Court in the case of Bussa Rajendra V State of Andhra Pradesh, W.P. PIL. No. 140/2022 Dated 14/09/2022 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 15, 16, 19, 21 and 300A of the Indian Constitution and Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent authorities to demolish the construction made by the encroachments in government land of extent Ac. 0.14 cents in Survey No. 134/1 situated at Yatapaka Mandal, Alluri Seetharamaraju District, Andhra Pradesh duly considering the representation dated 06/04/2023 with reference to GO.MS. No. 188 Dated 21/07/2011 and the judgment of this Hon'ble High 3 Court in the case of Bussa Rajendra V State of Andhra Pradesh, W.P. PIL. No. 140/2022 Dated 14/09/202 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to demolish the construction made by the encroachments in government land of extent Ac. 0.14 cents in Survey No. 134/1 situated at Yatapaka Mandal, Alluri Seetharamaraju District, Andhra Pradesh duly considering the representation dated 06/04/2023 with reference to GO.MS. No. 188 Dated 21/07/2011 and the judgment of this Hon'ble High Court in the case of Bussa Rajendra V State of Andhra Pradesh, W.P. PIL. No. 140/2022 Dated 14/09/202 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the Respondents No. 8 in W.P. No. 10193 of 2023 to the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 3 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dt.26.04.2023 in WP No. 10193 of 2023 pending disposal of above writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N LALITHA SREE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 4 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Nallanagula Lalitha Sree, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and that it has become infructuous. Hence, nothing further remains for adjudication. Recording the said submissions, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 01.12.2025 ANS 5 145 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10193/2023 Date: 01.12.2025 ANS