IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 130 Amandeep Kaur State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Rohit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Mr. Amarpreet Sing *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant the benefit of advertised pay scale on the judgment of this Court in Punjab and another against which LPA instructions, prays that a direction be given to the respondents to decide the cla of the petitioners keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a d decide the claim of the petitioners a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 25.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-113 Date of decision: 25.04.2025 Amandeep Kaur and others Versus State of Punjab and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Rohit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to benefit of advertised pay scale with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in Saurabh Punjab and another, CWP-15896-2023, which was allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA-2977-2024 has also been dismissed on 10.12.2024. He, on instructions, prays that a direction be given to the respondents to decide the cla of the petitioners keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a d decide the claim of the petitioners, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 11382-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.04.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Rohit Aggarwal, Advocate for , Advocate for the petitioners. h Bains, AAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to with regard to which reliance is placed Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of 2023, which was allowed on 13.09.2024 2024 has also been dismissed on 10.12.2024. He, on instructions, prays that a direction be given to the respondents to decide the cla of the petitioners keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to with regard to which reliance is placed Sharma and others vs. State of 2023, which was allowed on 13.09.2024 2024 has also been dismissed on 10.12.2024. He, on instructions, prays that a direction be given to the respondents to decide the claim of the petitioners keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the irection to the respondents to taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.25 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document