HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1635 of 1984 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. None present for the informant. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the parties have entered into compromise and they have settled their disputes outside the court. A joint compromise affidavit was filed before the court concerned and this Court vide order dated 23.11.2022 directed the court concerned to verify the authenticity of the joint affidavit and sent verification report to this Court. In compliance of the order dated 23.11.2022 passed by this Court, joint compromise affidavit filed by the parties alongwith compromise verification report dated 05.01.2023 was sent by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Muzaffarnagar to this Court which is on record. It is further submitted that on the ground of compromise between the parties the appellant Kura was granted bail by this Court. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Asheesh Kumar Tiwari, Dharmendra Pratap Singh, Sandeep Kumar Rai, Satyendra Kumar Pal, Varun Dev Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.G.A., Sanjay Singh Lala @ Atar Singh And Another .....Appellant(s) State .....Respondent(s) 3. As per office report based upon the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar, appellant No. 1 Lala alias Atar Singh has died. Hence, the appeal against him is abated. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, if the parties have entered into compromise and joint compromise affidavit has been verified by the concerned court, nothing rests in the instant appeal. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in terms of compromise. 6. The appeal is consigned to records. September 12, 2025 Rmk. CRLA No. 1635 of 1984 2 (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad