Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010250592012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2565/2012 Between:
1. G.SRINIVASA REDDY, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O PRAKASH NAGAR NARASARAOPET GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP ANOTHER, REP BY ITS STATE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP., HYDERABAD
2. GANGINENI KONDALA RAO, S/O MARTHAIAH OCC: ADVOCATE R/O ARUNDALPET OPP: SAVERA HOTEL NARASARAOPET TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the Revision petition by setting aside the order and Judgment dt 03.10.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 124/2011 on the file of the Hon’ble XIII Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet in so far as setting aside the imprisonment of 3 months imposed on the accused by the Hon’ble trial Court Consequently to confirm the Judgment of the Hon’ble I Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet dt 19.04.2011 passed in CC No.19/2006 thereby to restore the imprisonment of 3 months imposed on the accused and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 3769 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified Copy of the Calendar and
Judgment of the Hon’ble trial Court in CC No. 19/2006 dt 19.04.2011 on the file of the Hon’ble I Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B CHINNAPA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. KOTHA LEELA GANESH RAGHAVENDRA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2565 of 2012
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 03.10.2012 passed in Crl.A.No.124 of 2011 on the file of the learned XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant and learned counsel for the respondent No.2/accused are present.
3. Both the learned counsel submit that the matter has been settled before mediators.
4. Perused the mediator’s report.
5. As per the report of the mediator, the petitioner/complainant received Rs.17,00,000/- through NIFT ICICI Bank, Guntur, Lakshmipuram Branch, from the 2nd respondent/accused towards full and final settlement.
6. Since the matter is settled before the mediators and the petitioner/complainant received the amount, this revision petition is disposed of as cause does not survive.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 24.09.2025 M K K