Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48824 (AP)

D N NAGAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28720/2025 · 2025-10-16

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010555762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28720/2025 Between: 1. D N NAGAMMA, W/O B MAHANTESH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O 1-295, JAMBULABANDA, KEKATHI, GUDIBANDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515305. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE, MEGA DSC - 2025,REP. BY ITS CONVENOR, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the appointment as School Assistant (Physical Education) / Physical Education Teacher under Mega DSC- 2025 to the petitioner orally on the ground that the petitioner has done her B.Pd. course while she was working as contract teacher at KGBV is as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the NOTE Regulations, 2014 and also violative of Art 14,19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to issue the appointment order to the petitioner without reference to the course that she was eligible for the DSC-2025 considering the orders of this Hon'ble court in WP No 24858 of 2025 and WP NO 23469 of 2025 dated 8.09.2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to reserve one post in the category of BC-D for the post of School Assistant Physical Education or to create a supernumerary postand pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner to the post of School Assistant (Physical Education) in view of her eligibility pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28720 OF 2025 ORDER:- The Present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in withholding the appointment of petitioner as School Assistant under Mega DSC-2025 orally on the ground that the petitioner has done her B.Pd. Course while she was working as contract teacher at KGBV as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permissions of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. The Writ Petition, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 17.10.2025 sj 4 173 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28720 OF 2025 Date: 17.10.2025 sj