[2025:RJ-JP:47147] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14395/2025 Hamid Hussain S/o Shri Ambrela, Aged About 20 Years, Bhuchaka Ps Puhana District Nuh Haryana Presently Residing At Honda Chowk Banveerpur P.s. Khushkheda, District Khairthal Tijara (Raj). Accused Applicant In Jail At Kishangarh Bas. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14396/2025 Jeetu @ Jitendra S/o Shri Atar Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Banveerpur, P.s. Khushkheda, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). (Accused Applicant In Jail At Kishangarh Bas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Yadav Mr. Ankit Yadav For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Sanjay Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/11/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.281/2025 registered at Police Station-Tapukada, District-Bhiwadi for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 140(3) and 307 of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:47147] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14395/2025] 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that no recovery has been made from the present petitioners and no test identification parade was conducted. Petitioners are behind the bars since 14.10.2025 without any criminal past. No custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the cases may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Hamid Hussain S/o Shri Ambrela and Jeetu @ Jitendra S/o Shri Atar Singh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the [2025:RJ-JP:47147] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14395/2025] sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/137-138