SURENDRA SINGH RANA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/889/2016 · 2025-10-09
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48821 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48821 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 889 of 2016 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Shri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants states that the application has become infructuous due to the proceedings before the Trial Court resulting in acquittal.
2. In view thereof, as the cause of action no more survives, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 10, 2025 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Surendra Singh Rana And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad