Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48820 (PAT)

Prashant Kumar @ Mayank Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./36212/2025 · 2025-06-18

Anil Kumar Sinha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36212 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2024 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Prashant Kumar @ Mayank Singh Son of Prem Bhushan Singh Resident of village - Ashok Bihar Colony, Bairiya bus stand ke pichhe, Paighambarpur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 18-06-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sadar Police Station Case No. 200 of 2024, dated 24.03.2024, disclosing offences under Sections 341/342/323/307/325/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 24.03.2024, in the morning, while the informant was returning his home on his motorcycle, two persons i.e. the petitioner and co-accused Prem Bhushan Singh signaled to stopped and started assaulting the informant. It has further been alleged that the petitioner assaulted the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36212 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 informant by means of khukri on his head due to which he sustained injury on his head and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant by means of iron-rod, hockey, belt, etc. on his leg causing fracture injury. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties are agnates having land dispute which would be evident from Annexure-P/2. Referring to the impugned order, learned counsel submits that though the injury caused to the informant has been discussed, but nature of injury as grievous has not been mentioned. 5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that both the parties are agnates having land dispute between them and in the impugned order injury has not been described as grievous in nature, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. 6. This application is, accordingly, allowed. 7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36212 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sadar Police Station Case No. 200 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ashwani/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T