ANUJ JAIN SON OF SHRI SAILESH JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8063/2025 · 2025-12-10
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48817 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48817 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50234] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.8063/2025 Anuj Jain Son Of Shri Sailesh Jain, Resident Of 23/305 Baje Wale Gali Kesharganj, Police Station Clock Tower Ajmer, District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer (Raj).
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line Ajmer, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/12/2025
1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.208/2023 registered with Police Station Civil Line, District Ajmer.
2. As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the FIR was registered against the accused person on 03.06.2023, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will
[2025:RJ-JP:50234] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8063/2025] take its own time & motion, so directions sought for should not be granted.
4. Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of June, 2023, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation.
5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. All applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/118