[2025:RJ-JP:43743] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16519/2025 Archna W/o Vishal Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 07, Chak 14, Bd Dhani, 14 Bd, Bikaner, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Ra- jasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education (Headquarter), Kota. 4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Kota. 5. The Election Registration Officer And Additional District Collector (City), Kota South, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 31/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is decided by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodh- pur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. [2025:RJ-JP:43743] (2 of 2) [CW-16519/2025] Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and present writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. 2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for pe- titioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Bharat Singh Ya- dav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors (supra), Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) and Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), writ petition may be disposed of with lib- erty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respon- dents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /86