CM-4114-CWP CWP-5433-2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Malkiat Singh and another State of Punjab a CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri for the applicant Mr. LAPITA BANERJI CM-4114-CWP This is an application for withd same has been rendered infructuous. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is By the consent of the parties, Board today. Main case It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as th authorities has Mr. Aditya Sharda, DAG, Punjab represents the State authorities. CWP-2025 in/and 2006 Sr. No.101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM CWP Date of Decision : Malkiat Singh and another Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate for the applicant-petitioners. Mr. Aditya Sharda, DAG, Punjab. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) CWP-2025 This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition as the same has been rendered infructuous. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is By the consent of the parties, the It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as th authorities has been complied with. Mr. Aditya Sharda, DAG, Punjab represents the State IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-4114-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-5433-2006 Date of Decision : 25.03.2025 …Applicant-petitioners …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate Sharda, DAG, Punjab. rawal of the writ petition as the For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. the main case is taken up on It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the demand of the Mr. Aditya Sharda, DAG, Punjab represents the State VANDANA 2025.03.28 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-4114-CWP CWP-5433-2006 In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition being CWP withdrawn. Connected applicatio of. March 25, 202 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable CWP-2025 in/and 2006 In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the the present writ petition being CWP Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the the present writ petition being CWP-5433-2006 is dismissed as ns, if any, are also accordingly disposed (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.03.28 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document