JITENDRA KUMAR S/O BIRJU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2181/2019 · 2025-11-17
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48812 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48812 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2181/2019
1. Jitendra Kumar S/o Birju Singh, aged about 33 Years, R/o Jhalra Farm House, V.P.O Adarsh Nagar, Bagat, District Jhunjhunu, Raj.
2. Pramod Kumar Soni S/o Hukm Chand Soni, aged about 23 Years, R/o Near Shahid J.P. Yadav School, Gopal Ji Ka Mohalla, Ward No.13, Neem Ka Thana, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Sikar, Raj.
3. Sunil Dutt Jangir S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Jangir, aged about 40 Years, R/o V.P.O. Sankhu, Tehsil-Laxmangarh, Sikar, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through P.P.
2. Ajeet Singh Yadav S/o Shri Naval Kishor Yadav, aged about 45 Years, R/o 44, Shiv Path, 21 South Colony, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara Police Station Jaipur, at present posted as Junior Assistant, Zila Parishad, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla with Ms. Sunita Mehla & Ms. Sunita Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/11/2025
1. The instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.71/2019 registered at Police Station-Banipark, District-Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC.
[2025:RJ-JP:46159] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2181/2019]
2. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor has produced factual report dated 17.11.2025 prepared by the S.H.O., Police Station-Banipark, District-Jaipur (West), which reveals that after completion of investigation, no offence was found against the petitioners. Hence, the police authorities have submitted a negative final report against the petitioners before the Competent Court which has also been accepted vide order dated 27.02.2025.
3. Factual Report dated 17.11.2025 is taken on record.
4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition at this stage.
5. Hence, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as being not pressed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/50