Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48810 (RAJ)

DHARM SINGH MEENA S/O DEVICHAND MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19329/2025 · 2025-12-11

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50367] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19329/2025 Dharm Singh Meena S/o Devichand Meena, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of A-135, Mahesh Nagar, Banipark, Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan) Posted As Principle And Equivalent, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Kurgaon, Karauli. (Employment Id No Rjjp200718011922) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan And Cum- Additional State Project Director (Senior) Samarg Shiksha Abhiyan (Smsa), Jaipur, Rajashtan. 4. Ganpat Lal Gupta, (Employment Id No. Rjka199926016457) Presently Posted At Govt. Senior Secondary School Kudinna (217567) Dhaulpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Kumar, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “.It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and the impugned order dated 22-09-2025 and relieving order dated 24-09-2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondent may be directed to continue the petitioner on [2025:RJ-JP:50367] (2 of 2) [CW-19329/2025] the post Principal Govt. Senior Secondary School, Kurgaon, Karauli. of Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J ashu /37