GAUTAMSINGH @ SHANI SON OF PUSHPENDRA SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLAS/2678/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48805 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48805 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43527] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2678/2025 Gautamsingh @ Shani Son Of Pushpendra Singh, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Bhagwanpur, Police Station Kherli Mode, District Bharatpur. (At Present Appellant Confined At Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur) ----Appellant Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Devnarayan Son Of Charansingh, Resident Of Chhokarwada Kala, Kherli Mode, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1875/2025 Anil Son Of Atar Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Chhokarwada Kalan Ps Khedli Moad District Bharatpur (Raj) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Sewar Bharatpur) ----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Dev Narayan Son Of Shri Charan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Chhokarwada Kalan, Police Station Khedli Moad, District Bharatpur ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2021/2025 Rachit @ Tutal S/o Gopalsingh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Hingota, Police Station Kherli Mode, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur) ----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Devnarayan S/o Charan Singh, R/o Chonkarwada Kala, Kherli Mode, Bharatpur. ----Respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:43527] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-2678/2025] For Appellant(s) : Mr. Brijesh Kumar Bhardwaj Mr. R R Goyal Mr. Rajeev Kumar with Mr. Aditya Joshi For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment 30/10/2025
1. These criminal appeals under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) have been filed on behalf of the appellants being aggrieved with the
order dated 27.08.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Bharatpur (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in FIR No.103/2025 registered at Police Station Kehrli Mod, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail applications filed on behalf of the appellants.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have falsely been implicated in these cases. They further submit that there is allegation of causing injuries to injured Devnarain by using firearm but as per medical report the injuries are simple in nature. He again submits that Appellants Gautam Singh is in custody since 27.6.2025, Anil since 31.5.2025 and Rachit since 31.5.2025. Appellants Rachit has only one criminal
[2025:RJ-JP:43527] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-2678/2025] antecedent to his credit. Charge sheet has been filed. Therefore, the appeals presented by the present appellants may be allowed.
4. Despite service, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the appeals.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellants under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act.
7. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 27.08.2025 passed by the learned trial court is set aside. It is directed that appellants- Gautamsingh @ Shani Son Of Pushpendra Singh, Anil Son Of Atar Singh and Rachit @ Tutal S/o Gopalsingh shall be released on bail provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/207-209