Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48803 (PNJ)

EX ASI SARITA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/11602/2025 · 2025-05-13

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` CWP-11602-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CWP-11602-2025 Date of Decision: 13.05.2025 Ex. ASI Sarita …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. U.K. Agnihotri, Advocate and Mr. Anshul Agnihotri, Advocate and Ms. Anuj Y. Attri, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of: i. order dated 29.06.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.4 whereby she has been dismissed from service; ii. order dated 12.08.2022 (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent No.3 whereby her appeal has been dismissed; and iii. order dated 26.04.2023 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.2 whereby revision petition filed by her has been kept pending till judicial decision in FIR No.16 dated 28.06.2022 under Sections 7 & 7-A of Prevention MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.13 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement. ` CWP-11602-2025 -2- of Corruption Act, 1988 registered at Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Karnal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that grievance of the petitioner, at this stage, would be redressed if respondent No.2- Director General of Police, Haryana (‘DGP’) is directed to decide her revision as well as representation (Annexure P-7). 3. Respondent No.2-DGP has kept the petitioner’s revision pending on the request of the petitioner and through instant petition, she is seeking adjudication of her revision. She is further claiming that she has filed representation before DGP seeking her reinstatement. 4. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of respondent-State, submits that revision was kept pending on the request of the petitioner and if she wants adjudication of revision, DGP would pass an appropriate order within four weeks from today. 5. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Haryana to adjudicate revision of the petitioner within four weeks from today. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 13.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.13 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.