Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48801 (RAJ)

ANIL S/O SURESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10158/2025 · 2025-10-06

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40459] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8673/2025 Aaryan S/o Deepak Kumar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Valmiki Basti, Charkutab Gate, Ward No. 1, Hansi, Police Station Hansi City, District Hisar (Haryana). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10158/2025 Anil S/o Suresh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o House No. 14/3, Gusai Gate Hansi, PS Hansi City, District Hisar (Haryana). (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 06/10/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused- applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 991/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Alwar District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Sections 310(2), 331(6) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:40459] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8673/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has relied upon order dated 28.07.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7489/2025 wherein Co-accused- Sujal and Rishi have already been enlarged on bail. It is further submitted that qua age and custody period also the facts are akin, therefore parity ought to be maintained qua the accused- applicants herein. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor is unable to refute the contentions of the learned counsel for the accused-applicants. 4. Heard. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail to maintain parity. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Aaryan S/o Deepak Kumar & Anil S/o Suresh shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. Furthermore, taking note of the criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicants, as an extended interpretation of the provisions of 'community service' as enshrined under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, and as a reformative approach to re-include the accused-applicants back in the society with a better vision, aim [2025:RJ-JP:40459] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8673/2025] and zeal in life, this court deems it fit to impose an ancillary condition upon the applicants, therefore, it is directed that the accused-applicants shall contribute to the Swach Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months from the date of enlarging on bail, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/53-54