APHC010446482014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30388/2014 Between: 1. THENNETI INDRAZITH,, S/ O.YESURATNAM, AGED 26 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, MATTAPARRU VILLAGE, PODURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2. AMBASSADOR OF INDIA, DIPLOMATIC ENCLAVE, ARABIAN GULF STREET, P.0 BOX NO.1450, SAFAT 13015, KUWAIT. 3. AMBASSADOR OF KUWAIT, NEW DELHI. 4. CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF A P, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 5. ALZAHARAALZAHIRA QATHA21, INDUSTRY STREET NO.5, GAREGE-124, KHASIMA-800 017, KUWAIT CIVIL ID NO.36198/301581, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondent 1 to 4 to take necessary action on the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2014 and pass such other further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 37989 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 to 4 to consider petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2014 and take appropriate action against the 5th respondent as per law and call back the petitioner's brother Thenneti Karnudu (Passport No.H1610302) to his mother land (India) immediately and pass such other further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO MANDA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 16th September, 2025 cbn 4 124 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.30388 of 2014 16th September, 2025 cbn