APHC010038742020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Sagari Radhika Devi The Union Of India and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMIDI SATHYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S S VARMA 2. . The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was served on the petitioner on 20.11. taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner on IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2329/2020 ...PETITIONER AND The Union Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMIDI SATHYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following: On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was served on the petitioner on 20.11.2024. However, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner on IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was 2024. However, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner on 2 02.12.2024 and 20.01.2025, therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal. 2. Today, though the matter listed “For Dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 22.01.2025 MSI 3 191 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2329/2020 Date: 22.01.2025 MSI