APHC010133032022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. Ms.P.Seshamamba, D/o Palem Narasimhulu Aged about 83 years, retd.Principal Government Womens's College Hindupur, 2. Smt.P.Krishnapriya, w/o Palem Goutham Chandrakanth, aged 36 years, 3. Palem Goutham Chandrakanth,, S/o Venkata are residents of D.No.1/1944 and 1/1944 D.No.1/2617, UGH 33 B APHB Colony, Kadapa city 1. The State of AP, reptd by its Pr. Secretary Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi village Amaravathy Mandal, Guntur district AP 522237 2. The Director General of Police, Government of AP, near TDP party head office, Mangalagiri town Guntur district 517002 3. The Superintendent of Police, kadapa 4. The Dy Superintendent of Police, Kadap 5. The SubInspector of Police, I town PS Kadapa IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8313 OF 2022 1. Ms.P.Seshamamba, D/o Palem Narasimhulu Aged about 83 years, retd.Principal Government Womens's College Hindupur, 2. Smt.P.Krishnapriya, w/o Palem Goutham Chandrakanth, aged 36 years, 3. Palem Goutham Chandrakanth,, S/o Venkata Rao (late) aged 42 years, all are residents of D.No.1/1944 and 1/1944-1 and 1/1944-2, Presently at D.No.1/2617, UGH 33 B APHB Colony, Kadapa city ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of AP, reptd by its Pr. Secretary Department of Home, village Amaravathy Mandal, Guntur district AP 522237 2. The Director General of Police, Government of AP, near TDP party head office, Mangalagiri town Guntur district 517002 3. The Superintendent of Police, kadapa 4. The Dy Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District 5. The SubInspector of Police, I town PS Kadapa IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Ms.P.Seshamamba, D/o Palem Narasimhulu Aged about 83 years, 2. Smt.P.Krishnapriya, w/o Palem Goutham Chandrakanth, aged 36 years, Rao (late) aged 42 years, all 2, Presently at ...Petitioners 1. The State of AP, reptd by its Pr. Secretary Department of Home, village Amaravathy Mandal, Guntur district AP 522237 2. The Director General of Police, Government of AP, near TDP party head 6. Sri V Narayana SI of Police, s/o not known, aged about 35 years I town P.S.Kadapa town and city ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order direction or proceeding or a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.6 who is also the SI of Police I town PS Kadapa in interfering into the civil liberties and freedom and asking the petitioners in particular petitioners no. 1 and 2, to come to the police station and harassing them mentally and financially and not investigating into the complaint/FIR No. 266/2021 registered on 25-12-2021 under s.12o-B, 199,200,209,465, 471 r/w 34 IPC and S.156(3) of Cr.P.C. Kadapa I town PS, lodged by the 3rd petitioner, and not filing any charge sheet, instead demanding huge amounts from the petitioners for conducting investigation into the FIR No.266/2021, failing which, Respondent no. 6 is threatening that he would be registering false cases against the petitioners and misbehaving with the petitioners nos 1 and 2 and using foul, filthy language against them and creating fear psychosis, as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the R-6 not to interfere into the civil liberties, freedom of the petitioners and not to demand monies to conduct investigation in FIR No. 266/2021 I town PS kadapa and further not to call for she petitioners especially the petitioners 1 and 2 to the police station and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent no.6 not to call for the petitioners, especially the petitioner no. 1 and 2, to the police station and not to harass the petitioners mentally and physically and not to demand monies from them to conduct investigation into FIR No. 266/2021 I Town PS Kadapa and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: S S BHATT Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:8313 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to to issue an order direction or proceeding or a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.6 who is also the SI of Police I town PS Kadapa in interfering into the civil liberties and freedom and asking the petitioners in particular petitioners no. 1 and 2, to come to the police station and harassing them mentally and financially and not investigating into the complaint/FIR No. 266/2021 registered on 25-12-2021 under s.12o- B, 199,200,209,465, 471 r/w 34 IPC and S.156(3) of Cr.P.C. Kadapa I town PS, lodged by the 3rd petitioner, and not filing any charge sheet, instead demanding huge amounts from the petitioners for conducting investigation into the FIR No.266/2021, failing which, Respondent no. 6 is threatening that he would be registering false cases against the petitioners and misbehaving with the petitioners nos 1 and 2 and using foul, filthy language against them and creating fear psychosis, as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the R-6 not to interfere into the civil liberties, freedom of the petitioners and not to demand monies to conduct investigation in FIR No. 266/2021 I town PS kadapa and further not to call for she petitioners especially the petitioners 1 and 2 to the police station and pass…” 2. Heard Sri S.S.Bhatt, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:8313 of 2022 Dated 10.12.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P. No.8313 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 10.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate order). ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV