Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48795 (RAJ)

MUKESH BHOI, S/O NATHULAL BHOI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14284/2025 · 2025-10-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42915] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14284/2025 Mukesh Bhoi, S/o Nathulal Bhoi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo- Danpur, Tehsil- Chhoti Sarwan, District- Banswara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Ms. Sweekriti Sharma and Mr. Devang Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve him a copy of writ petition. 4. Instant writ petition is filed with following prayer:- (i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Nursing Officer [2025:RJ-JP:42915] (2 of 3) [CW-14284/2025] under OBC-NCL Category with all consequential benefits as he secured more marks than the last cut off in his category. (ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the impugned Final Merit List dated 06.12.2024 may kindly be quashed and set aside. (iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to consider the experience certificate of the petitioner and also award 30 marks as bonus on the experience certificate. 4. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that aggrieved from Final Merit List dated 06.12.2024, the petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition on the ground that the petitioner is entitled for appointment on the post of Nursing Officer under OBC-NCL Category as he deserves a place in the merits list with finally selected candidates, on basis of marks secured by the petitioner. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned AGC on the ground that petitioner has already preferred a S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3165/2025 and same is pending before this Hon’ble Court, wherein this petitioner has already secured an interim order on 05.03.2025. 6. Having considered submission of learned counsel for parties, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to submit a representation to ventilate his grievances. 7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a [2025:RJ-JP:42915] (3 of 3) [CW-14284/2025] reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /06