APHC010451272003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22193/2003 Between: 1. K. KOTI REDDY, S/O CHINA NAGI REDDY R/O 75 PARSA TYALLURU, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. YETARI SATYANARAYANA, S/O KAMESWARA RAP R/O 75 PARSA TYALLURU, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. REPUDI RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O MARIYADAS R/O 75 PARSA TYALLURU, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUBDIVISIONAL COOP OFFICER, INSPECTION OFFICER, THE PARA SATYALLURU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOP. SOCIETY LTD., O/O THE DIVL COOP OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. PARASATYALLURU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOP SOCIETY LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIR-PERSON, PARAS STYALLURU PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. JOINT REGISTRAR/DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the instructions dt.16-8-2003 in Rc.No. 516/99-E of the Divisional Co-operative Officer, Guntur, Guntur District ie.,. the 1st respondent instructing the 3rd respondent herein to file Criminal Complaint against the petitioner herein along with 6 others as they are without jurisdiction, unjust, arbitrary, contrary to Section 83(3) of the A.P. Coop Societies Act 7 of 1964, offending Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and hence set-aside and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 27728 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the instructions dt.16-8-2003 in Rc.No. 516/99E of the Divisional Cooperative Officer, Guntur, Guntur District i.e., the 1st respondent in so far as the petitioners are conducted, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D V BHADRAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. GP FOR COOPERATION 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 11.09.2025 and 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting their case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 196 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:22193 of 2003 Date: 25.09.2025 MP