Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48792 (BOM)

AKOT SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, AKOT, THR. PRESIDENT, MOHAN ANANTRAO ASARKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

WP/2149/2021 · 2025-04-07

Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 503.wp.2149.21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2149/2021 Akot Shikshan Sanstha, Akot Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R. G. Kavimandan, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. I. J. Damle, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1/State. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 07/05/2025. . In spite of the objections being notified and sufficient chances being granted, the objections are not removed. 2. As such, by way of last chance, we grant time of six weeks to remove office objections. 3. Failure to remove office objections will entail the dismissal of the petition without further reference to the Court. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule