-1- 2025:CGHC:1390 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 573 of 2017 1 - Dr. Sharad Karnewar S/o Shri Vikram Karnewar, Aged About 34 Years R/o Dandeshwar Shiv Mandir, Jabdapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through The Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Main Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 608 of 2017 1 - Nitesh Ekka S/o Philip Ekka, Aged About 32 Years R/o House No. 02, Shiva Residency, Phase I, Mathpurena, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary, Department Of Scheduled Tribe And Scheduled Caste Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through The Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Main Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- For Petitioners : Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate For respective respondents : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G. and Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate along with Ms. Mahi Pandey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09.01.2025 1) Heard. 2) Dr. Agrawal, counsel appearing for the respondent/CGPSC would submit that the merit list was published on 28.02.2017 and the selected candidates have already been offered appointment and they have not been made party in these petitions. 3) On the other hand, Mr. Verma, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that he has no instruction in these matters. 4) Taking into consideration the above-stated facts, both petitions are hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha