Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48788 (RAJ)

VISHNU PRASAD SONI SON OF SHRI SATYANARAYAN SONI v. PRADEEP SONI SON OF SHRI OMPRAKASH SONI

CMA/2909/2022 · 2025-11-19

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46736] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2909/2022 Vishnu Prasad Soni Son of Shri Satyanarayan Soni, Resident of Shop No. G-4, Nahari Ka Naka, Painter Colony Chauraha, Radha Govind Complex-4, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Pradeep Soni Son of Shri Omprakash Soni, At Present Resident Of Plot No. 102, Riddhi Siddhi Nagar, Nangal Jaisa Bohra Road, Niwaru Road, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anant Priya Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 19/11/2025 1. The present appeal has been filed by the defendant- appellant, assailing the order dated 14.07.2022 passed by the Additional District Judge No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.33/2019 (CIS No.718/2019), whereby the appellant's application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside an ex-parte judgment and decree dated 12.10.2017 has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties, upon instructions of their respective clients, who are present in Court, submit that the parties are willing to settle their entire matter finally by way of a compromise. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, he has no objection [2025:RJ-JP:46736] (2 of 2) [CMA-2909/2022] if the impugned order dated 14.07.2022 is set aside and the appellant's application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is allowed. 4. In view of the consensus mentioned above, the impugned order dated 14.07.2022 is set aside, the appellant's application dated 02.07.2019 filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is allowed, and the ex-parte decree dated 12.10.2017 is set aside. Consequently, the learned Trial Court is directed to re-decide the civil suit on merits in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. 6. Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /52