Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48786 (CHH)

RASHMI TIGGA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9106/2023 · 2025-11-02

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:53714 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9106 of 2023 Rashmi Tigga D/o Najrius Tigga Aged About 33 Years R/o Primary Health Centre, Bachrapodi, District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Health Services, Directorate Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director, (Nursing) Health Services, Directorate Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Medical Health Officer, Manendragarh District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Kalpana Vishwakarma W/o Shri Vishwakarma, Aged About 37 Years Primary Health Centre, Khompa Pani, Manendragarh, District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate For State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 03.11.2025 1 The present petition has been filed with the following relief(s) :- “10.1 To call for the records of the case for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.03 18:38:14 +0530 2 10.2 To issue an appropriate writ or order and to set aside the impugned order dated 04.09.23 passed by res. no. 3 (Annexure P-8) and further to quash the impugned order dated 02.09.23 by which NOC has been granted to the respondent no.5 in place of petitioner and to direct the respondent authorities to grant permission to the petitioner in the form of NOC to pursue higher education i.e. M.SC Nursing in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by efflux of time, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3 Learned counsel appearing for the State concurs with the said submission. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh