1 2025:CGHC:54765-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3382 of 2025 Smt. Pushpa Pandey W/o Late Ravi Pandey Aged About 85 Years R/o Nirala Nagar, Behind Hanuman Mandir, Behind Old Bus Stand, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- City Kotwali, District- Raipur C.G. 2. Rajendra Kumar Shukla S/o Late Gaya Prasad Shukla Aged About 65 Years R/o Shukla Bhawan, Sadar Bazar, Raipur, Police Station- City Kotwali, District- Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 11/11/2025 1. Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned G.A. for the respondent/ State. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.11.12 10:20:32 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and further be pleased to quash the cognizance order dated 21.12.2018 taken by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) registering the Criminal Case No. 8736/2018 and further be pleased to quash the Final Report No. 209/2018 dated 31.10.2018 for the offence punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 34 of Indian Penal Code and FIR bearing Crime No. 145/2008 dated 04.07.2008 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, District - Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 420, 34 of Indian Penal Code (in respect of the present applicant only), in the interest of justice.” 3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one as the charge framing order has not been challenged, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court for 3 wasting precious time fo the court and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti