Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48780 (PNJ)

RAKESH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/21612/2025 · 2025-05-26

Mahabir Singh Sindhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M No.21612 of 2025 (O&M) -1- 248 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.21612 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2025 Rakesh ......... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present:- Mr. Laghuinder Singh Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana for the respondent. **** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Second petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) for grant of bail pending trial to petitioner in FIR No.191 dated 25.06.2023, under Sections 20(b)(ii) (c), 27-A & 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Uklana, District Hisar. (2) After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer, learned Counsel for petitioner on instructions submits that present petition be disposed off as not pressed “at this stage”. GAGANDEEP 2025.05.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M No.21612 of 2025 (O&M) -2- (3) So ordered. (4) It is clarified that above observations be not construed as an expression of opinion on merits of the case in any manner. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 26th May, 2025 ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) Gagan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No GAGANDEEP 2025.05.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh