Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48778 (PNJ)

DR SAT NARAIN BANSAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CWP/11147/2025 · 2025-04-24

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 139 CWP-11147-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.04.2025 Dr. Sat Narain Bansal ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms. Parbeen Kumari Dharwal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner(s) seeking issuance of an appropriate writ especially in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to re-fix the pension of the petitioner in the pay-scale of Rs.37400-67000+8700 (GP) instead of lower pay-scale of Rs.15600-39100+8000 (GP) w.e.f. 01.01.2006 corresponding to the pay- scale of Rs.13500-17250/- already granted to Civil Surgeons availing pre- revised pay-scale of Rs.13500-17250/-. 2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent No. 1, is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner by passing a well reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and she submits that she has no objection to the aforesaid prayer being granted. MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.24 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 139 CWP-11147-2025 (O&M) 5. The present petition is accordingly disposed of without commenting on the merits of the present case and with a direction to respondent No.1-Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of Haryana, Health and Family Welfare Department, Haryana (Chandigarh) to consider the claim of the petitioner by treating the present writ petition as a representation and the same shall be decided expeditiously and preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, after granting an effective opportunity of hearing to the respective parties, in accordance with law. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 24.04.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.24 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document