[2025:RJ-JP:47802] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18164/2025 Sarupee Bai Meena D/o Shri Prahlad Prasad Meena, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Adalpur, Post Banawar, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa, At Present Working As Teacher Grade Iii, Level-1 At Government Senior Secondary School Raipur, Block Mahuwa, District Dausa. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 3. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 4. District Education Officer (Hq.), Secondary Education, Dausa. 5. Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Block Mahuwa, District Dausa. 6. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School Raipur, Block Mahuwa, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to recalculate / re- assesse the probation period and regularize the petitioner's service on completing two years' from the date of his initial appointment i.e. [2025:RJ-JP:47802] (2 of 3) [CW-18164/2025] 04.03.1997 and accordingly grant her regular pay scale, AGI and benefits of selection scales and summer vacations salary, with all consequential benefits alongwith interest @ 12 % p.a. 2. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon judgment in case of Smt. Santosh Singhal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (order dated 30.04.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4492/2006), the order dated 18.12.2023 in the case of Prakash Veer Maan & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20759/2018) and also order dated 20.01.2014 in the case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3534/2009) and submits that the controversy raised herein is already settled, by a Co-ordinate Bench. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner in light of ratio laid down in case of Smt. Santosh Singhal (supra), Prakash Veer Maan & Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:47802] (3 of 3) [CW-18164/2025] (supra) and Yogesh Kumar Pareek (supra) but in case of deviation, with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /123