Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48776 (RAJ)

GAYATRI DEVI W/O LATE KUDEEP SINGH v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CRES/453/2024 · 2025-10-06

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40451] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 453/2024 In S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 205/2023 1. Gayatri Devi W/o Late Kudeep Singh, aged about 35 Years, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar and District Alwar 2. Baby Nikita D/o Late Kuldeep Singh, aged about 12 Years, through Guardian, Mother Gayatri Devi W/o Late Kudeep Singh, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar and District Alwar 3. Master Aman S/o Late Kuldeep Singh, aged about 9 Years, through Guardian, Mother Gayatri Devi W/o Late Kudeep Singh, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar and District Alwar 4. Laxmi Devi W/o Shriram, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar, and District Alwar (Died During Suit) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, through Chairman, Ram Mandir Marg, Jaipur 2. Assistant Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Mundawar, District Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kamal Gaur For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 06/10/2025 1. It has been pointed out that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the restoration application seeking to restore the S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 205/2023. 2. Counsel for petitioners states that the delay occurred inadvertently and due to miscalculation of period of limitation. 3. Considering the short period of delay, same is hereby condoned. [2025:RJ-JP:40451] (2 of 2) [CRES-453/2024] 4. For the reasons stated in the restoration application, the same is allowed. S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 205/2023 is allowed to be restored to its original number. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /24