GAYATRI DEVI W/O LATE KUDEEP SINGH v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
CRES/453/2024 · 2025-10-06
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48776 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48776 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40451] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 453/2024 In S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 205/2023
1. Gayatri Devi W/o Late Kudeep Singh, aged about 35 Years, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar and District Alwar
2. Baby Nikita D/o Late Kuldeep Singh, aged about 12 Years, through Guardian, Mother Gayatri Devi W/o Late Kudeep Singh, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar and District Alwar
3. Master Aman S/o Late Kuldeep Singh, aged about 9 Years, through Guardian, Mother Gayatri Devi W/o Late Kudeep Singh, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar and District Alwar
4. Laxmi Devi W/o Shriram, R/o Sarai Kalan, Tehsil and Police Station Mundawar, and District Alwar (Died During Suit) ----Petitioners Versus
1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, through Chairman, Ram Mandir Marg, Jaipur
2. Assistant Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Mundawar, District Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kamal Gaur For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 06/10/2025
1. It has been pointed out that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the restoration application seeking to restore the S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 205/2023.
2. Counsel for petitioners states that the delay occurred inadvertently and due to miscalculation of period of limitation.
3. Considering the short period of delay, same is hereby condoned.
[2025:RJ-JP:40451] (2 of 2) [CRES-453/2024]
4. For the reasons stated in the restoration application, the same is allowed. S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 205/2023 is allowed to be restored to its original number.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /24